67 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
67 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Getting help with Memories
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Help and FAQ
|
|
|
|
## Getting Help
|
|
|
|
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out at
|
|
|
|
- [Discord community](https://discord.gg/7Dr9f9vNjJ) (any questions, feedback, suggestions, etc.)
|
|
- [GitHub issues](https://github.com/pulsejet/memories/issues) (bugs and feature requests)
|
|
|
|
## FAQ
|
|
|
|
**How is it different from the default Nextcloud Photos app?**
|
|
|
|
You can find a full comparison [here](../memories-vs-photos).
|
|
|
|
**What apps does Memories compete against?**
|
|
|
|
Commercial cloud photo services. The target is to be better than `X` service provider that you pay $$$ for, and be usable by grandma.
|
|
|
|
**Is it production ready?**
|
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
**Does it support multiple users and external sharing?**
|
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
**Why is it tied to Nextcloud? Isn't this a lot of overhead? Isn't PHP slow?**
|
|
|
|
1. Reinventing the wheel is pointless. If Memories was a dedicated app, that would mean re-implementing everything from automatic file upload to multi-user support and auth integrations. The maintenance overhead of such a codebase increases exponentially, all while completely unnecessary since someone else is maintaining the exact same things in another piece of software. Integrating with Nextcloud is what makes Memories sustainable.
|
|
1. PHP and Nextcloud have become very fast over the last few years, and running both is very minimal overhead. Functions such as upgrading Nextcloud
|
|
to newer versions is seamless especially when using Docker.
|
|
1. The power of Memories is integration: the Nextcloud ecosystem provides tons of other apps for extending functionality.
|
|
|
|
**Why doesn't it support `<some-feature>` such as XMP tags and advanced metadata editing?**
|
|
|
|
The target user of Memories is not a tech-savvy self-hoster. Most commonly used / available features will be given priority over advanced features, e.g. most useful for professionals / photographers / data hoarders. That doesn't mean to say these features will necessarily not be implemented.
|
|
|
|
**Does Memories support a folder structure for storage?**
|
|
|
|
Yes. All photos are stored in a folder structure, and only displayed as a flat timeline. This means you can swap out Memories for any other photo app if you want (no lock-in). You can also view the photos in the folder structure if you desire.
|
|
|
|
**Does it have a mobile app?**
|
|
|
|
Not yet. The web app is very responsive on mobile. You can use the official Nextcloud app to auto-upload photos and videos from your device.
|
|
|
|
**How is it better than the `Y` FOSS photo manager?**
|
|
|
|
UX and performance. The devil is in the details.
|
|
|
|
**It's slow or doesn't work**
|
|
|
|
Make sure you follow the [troubleshooting steps](../troubleshooting/#performance). Unless you have hundreds of thousands of photos on a Raspberry Pi, Memories should be very fast. File an issue otherwise.
|
|
|
|
**It says "nothing to show here" on startup?**
|
|
|
|
Indexing is performed in the background, and can take a while depending on the number of photos. Follow
|
|
the [configuration steps](../config) and be patient.
|
|
|
|
**Will it run on my system?**
|
|
|
|
In general, if you can run Nextcloud, you should be able to run Memories. File an issue if you run into problems.
|