244 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
244 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: default
|
|
title: Access Control
|
|
parent: Configuration
|
|
nav_order: 1
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Access Control
|
|
{: .no_toc }
|
|
|
|
## Policies
|
|
|
|
With **Authelia** you can define a list of rules that are going to be evaluated in
|
|
sequential order when authorization is delegated to Authelia.
|
|
|
|
The first matching rule of the list defines the policy applied to the resource, if
|
|
no rule matches the resource a customizable default policy is applied.
|
|
|
|
### deny
|
|
|
|
This is the policy applied by default, and is what we recommend as the default policy for all installs. Its effect
|
|
is literally to deny the user access to the resource. Additionally you can use this policy to conditionally deny
|
|
access in desired situations. Examples include denying access to an API that has no authentication mechanism built in.
|
|
|
|
### bypass
|
|
|
|
This policy skips all authentication and allows anyone to use the resource. This policy is not available with a rule
|
|
that includes a [subject](#Subjects) restriction because the minimum authentication level required to obtain information
|
|
about the subject is [one_factor](#one_factor).
|
|
|
|
### one_factor
|
|
|
|
This policy requires the user at minimum complete 1FA successfully (username and password). This means if they have
|
|
performed 2FA then they will be allowed to access the resource.
|
|
|
|
### two_factor
|
|
|
|
This policy requires the user to complete 2FA successfully. This is currently the highest level of authentication
|
|
policy available.
|
|
|
|
## Default Policy
|
|
|
|
The default policy is the policy applied when no other rule matches. It is recommended that this is configured to
|
|
[deny](#deny) for security reasons. Sites which you do not wish to secure with Authelia should not be configured to
|
|
perform authentication with Authelia at all.
|
|
|
|
See [Policies](#policies) for more information.
|
|
|
|
## Network Aliases
|
|
|
|
The main networks section defines a list of network aliases, where the name matches a list of networks. These names can
|
|
be used in any [rule](#rules) instead of a literal network. This makes it easier to define a group of networks multiple
|
|
times.
|
|
|
|
You can combine both literal networks and these aliases inside the [networks](#networks) section of a rule. See this
|
|
section for more details.
|
|
|
|
## Rules
|
|
|
|
A rule defines two things:
|
|
|
|
* the matching criteria of the request presented to the reverse proxy
|
|
* the policy applied when all criteria match.
|
|
|
|
The criteria are:
|
|
|
|
* domain: domain or list of domains targeted by the request.
|
|
* resources: pattern or list of patterns that the path should match.
|
|
* subject: the user or group of users to define the policy for.
|
|
* networks: the network addresses, ranges (CIDR notation) or groups from where the request originates.
|
|
* methods: the http methods used in the request.
|
|
|
|
A rule is matched when all criteria of the rule match. Rules are evaluated in sequential order, and this is
|
|
particularly **important** for bypass rules. Bypass rules should generally appear near the top of the rules list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Policy
|
|
|
|
A policy represents the level of authentication the user needs to pass before
|
|
being authorized to request the resource.
|
|
|
|
See [Policies](#policies) for more information.
|
|
|
|
### Domains
|
|
|
|
The domains defined in rules must obviously be either a subdomain of the domain
|
|
protected by Authelia or the protected domain itself. In order to match multiple
|
|
subdomains, the wildcard matcher character `*.` can be used as prefix of the domain.
|
|
For instance, to define a rule for all subdomains of *example.com*, one would use
|
|
`*.example.com` in the rule. A single rule can define multiple domains for matching.
|
|
These domains can be either listed in YAML-short form `["example1.com", "example2.com"]`
|
|
or in YAML long-form as dashed list.
|
|
|
|
Domain prefixes can also be dynamically match users or groups. For example you can have a
|
|
specific policy adjustment if the user or group matches the subdomain. For
|
|
example `{user}.example.com` or `{group}.example.com` check the users name or
|
|
groups against the subdomain.
|
|
|
|
### Resources
|
|
|
|
A rule can define multiple regular expressions for matching the path of the resource
|
|
similar to the list of domains. If any one of them matches, the resource criteria of
|
|
the rule matches.
|
|
|
|
Note that regular expressions can be used to match a given path. However prior to 4.27.0, they do not match
|
|
the query parameters in the URL, only the path. If you're upgrading to 4.27.0+ you may have to alter some
|
|
resource rules to get them to work as they previously did.
|
|
|
|
You might also face some escaping issues preventing Authelia to start. Please make sure that
|
|
when you are using regular expressions, you enclose them between quotes. It's optional but
|
|
it will likely save you a lot of debugging time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Subjects
|
|
|
|
A subject is a representation of a user or a group of user for who the rule should apply.
|
|
|
|
For a user with unique identifier `john`, the subject should be `user:john` and for a group
|
|
uniquely identified by `developers`, the subject should be `group:developers`. Similar to resources
|
|
and domains you can define multiple subjects in a single rule.
|
|
|
|
If you want a combination of subjects to be matched at once using a logical `AND`, you can
|
|
specify a nested list of subjects like `- ["group:developers", "group:admins"]`.
|
|
In summary, the first list level of subjects are evaluated using a logical `OR`, whereas the
|
|
second level by a logical `AND`. The last example below reads as: the group is `dev` AND the
|
|
username is `john` OR the group is `admins`.
|
|
|
|
#### Combining subjects and the bypass policy
|
|
|
|
A subject cannot be combined with the `bypass` policy since the minimum authentication level to identify a subject is
|
|
`one_factor`. Combining the `one_factor` policy with a subject is effectively the same as setting the policy to `bypass`
|
|
in the past. We have taken an opinionated stance on preventing this configuration as it could result in problematic
|
|
security scenarios with badly thought out configurations and cannot see a likely configuration scenario that would
|
|
require users to do this. If you have a scenario in mind please open an
|
|
[issue](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/new) on GitHub.
|
|
|
|
### Networks
|
|
|
|
A list of network addresses, ranges (CIDR notation) or groups can be specified in a rule in order to apply different
|
|
policies when requests originate from different networks. This list can contain both literal definitions of networks
|
|
and [network aliases](#network-aliases).
|
|
|
|
Network addresses specified will be matched against the first IP in the X-Forwarded-For, and if there is none it will fall back to the IP address of the request. If using Authelia with a reverse proxy, additional configuration
|
|
may be required on the reverse proxy to ensure these headers are present and correct.
|
|
|
|
Main use cases for this rule option is to adjust the security requirements of a resource based on the location of
|
|
the user. For example lets say a resource should be exposed both on the Internet and from an
|
|
authenticated VPN for instance. Passing a second factor a first time to get access to the VPN and
|
|
a second time to get access to the application can sometimes be cumbersome if the endpoint is not
|
|
considered overly sensitive.
|
|
|
|
An additional situation where this may be useful is if there is a specific network you wish to deny access
|
|
or require a higher level of authentication for; like a public machine network vs a company device network, or a
|
|
BYOD network.
|
|
|
|
Even if Authelia provides this flexibility, you might prefer a higher level of security and avoid
|
|
this option entirely. You and only you can define your security policy and it's up to you to
|
|
configure Authelia accordingly.
|
|
|
|
### Methods
|
|
|
|
A list of HTTP request methods to apply the rule to. Valid values are GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE,
|
|
CONNECT, OPTIONS, and TRACE. Additional information about HTTP request methods can be found on the
|
|
[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods).
|
|
|
|
It's important to note this policy type is primarily intended for use when you wish to bypass authentication for
|
|
a specific request method. This is because there are several key limitations in what is possible to accomplish
|
|
without Authelia being a reverse proxy server. This rule type is discouraged unless you really know what you're
|
|
doing or you wish to setup a rule to bypass CORS preflight requests by bypassing for the OPTIONS method.
|
|
|
|
For example, if you require authentication only for write events (POST, PATCH, DELETE, PUT), when a user who is not
|
|
currently authenticated tries to do one of these actions, they will be redirected to Authelia. Authelia will decide
|
|
what level is required for authentication, and then after the user authenticates it will redirect them to the original
|
|
URL where Authelia decided they needed to authenticate. So if the endpoint they are redirected to originally had
|
|
data sent as part of the request, this data is completely lost. Further if the endpoint expects the data or doesn't allow
|
|
GET request types, the user may be presented with an error leading to a bad user experience.
|
|
|
|
## Complete example
|
|
|
|
Here is a complete example of complex access control list that can be defined in Authelia.
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
access_control:
|
|
default_policy: deny
|
|
networks:
|
|
- name: internal
|
|
networks:
|
|
- 10.10.0.0/16
|
|
- 192.168.2.0/24
|
|
- name: VPN
|
|
networks: 10.9.0.0/16
|
|
rules:
|
|
- domain: public.example.com
|
|
policy: bypass
|
|
|
|
- domain: "*.example.com"
|
|
policy: bypass
|
|
methods:
|
|
- OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
- domain: secure.example.com
|
|
policy: one_factor
|
|
networks:
|
|
- internal
|
|
- VPN
|
|
- 192.168.1.0/24
|
|
- 10.0.0.1
|
|
|
|
- domain:
|
|
- secure.example.com
|
|
- private.example.com
|
|
policy: two_factor
|
|
|
|
- domain: singlefactor.example.com
|
|
policy: one_factor
|
|
|
|
- domain: "mx2.mail.example.com"
|
|
subject: "group:admins"
|
|
policy: deny
|
|
|
|
- domain: "*.example.com"
|
|
subject:
|
|
- "group:admins"
|
|
- "group:moderators"
|
|
policy: two_factor
|
|
|
|
- domain: dev.example.com
|
|
resources:
|
|
- "^/groups/dev/.*$"
|
|
subject: "group:dev"
|
|
policy: two_factor
|
|
|
|
- domain: dev.example.com
|
|
resources:
|
|
- "^/users/john/.*$"
|
|
subject:
|
|
- ["group:dev", "user:john"]
|
|
- "group:admins"
|
|
policy: two_factor
|
|
|
|
- domain: "{user}.example.com"
|
|
policy: bypass
|
|
```
|