docs: update roadmap with new priorities based on feedbacks (#2878)
parent
50e9ccafa1
commit
64adb9eb67
|
@ -14,8 +14,11 @@ ideas and plans with you.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Below are the prioritised roadmap items:
|
Below are the prioritised roadmap items:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. **[In Preview](./configuration/identity-providers/oidc.md)** *this roadmap item is in preview status, more
|
1. Webauthn needs to be implemented because U2F is being deprecated in the browsers. Chrome displays an annoying popup
|
||||||
information can be found in the docs*.
|
advertising the deprecation. This is being implemented [here](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/pull/2707).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **[In Preview](./configuration/identity-providers/oidc.md)** *this roadmap item is in preview status since information
|
||||||
|
is not yet persisted in the database. More information can be found in the docs*.
|
||||||
[Authelia acts as an OpenID Connect Provider](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/189). This is a high
|
[Authelia acts as an OpenID Connect Provider](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/189). This is a high
|
||||||
priority because currently the only way to pass authentication information back to the protected app is through the
|
priority because currently the only way to pass authentication information back to the protected app is through the
|
||||||
use of HTTP headers as described
|
use of HTTP headers as described
|
||||||
|
@ -23,17 +26,21 @@ use of HTTP headers as described
|
||||||
however, many apps either do not support this method or are starting to move away from this in favour of OpenID Connect or OAuth2
|
however, many apps either do not support this method or are starting to move away from this in favour of OpenID Connect or OAuth2
|
||||||
internally or via plugins.
|
internally or via plugins.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. [Administration interface](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/974). This is useful in many cases to
|
3. [Multilingual full support](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/625). Support as been added but we heed to study multiple providers like Crowdin or Weblate
|
||||||
properly manage users and administrate activities like unbanning banned users. In the future we can even think of
|
to help us translate in more languages and make Authelia available to even more people around the world!
|
||||||
adding/removing users from there, request a password reset for a user or all users, request a 2FA enrollment,
|
|
||||||
temporarily block users, etc...
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. [User interface](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/303). This will help the users manage their 2FA
|
4. [Protection of multiple root domains](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/1198). This request has been upvoted many times and we heard you!
|
||||||
devices, reset their password, review their authentication activity.
|
Currently, an Authelia setup is only able to protect all subdomains of a given root domain. This situation is challenging for
|
||||||
In the future we envisage users will be able to customize their profile with an avatar, set their preferences
|
administrators maintaining services across multiple root domains so we have decided to prioritize this to enable those deployments.
|
||||||
regarding 2FA and according to the global policy defined by administrators, etc...
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. [Facilitate setup on Kubernetes](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/575). There are mainly two objectives
|
5. [User/Administrator interface](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/303). Many use cases raised on Github relates to
|
||||||
|
being able to audit, configure and administrate a given account on Authelia. For instance, a user should be able to reset the password
|
||||||
|
manage MFA hardware devices and personal security policies, etc... An administrator should be able to unban accounts after a regulation ban,
|
||||||
|
kill sessions to reduce security risk due to compromised accounts and many other things. This item will be decomposed into multiple
|
||||||
|
items for implementing the features but there is preparatory work to be done on the permissions (likely role-based) we want to
|
||||||
|
implement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
7. [Facilitate setup on Kubernetes](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/575). There are mainly two objectives
|
||||||
here. First, we need to provide the documentation required to setup Authelia on Kubernetes. Even though, some users
|
here. First, we need to provide the documentation required to setup Authelia on Kubernetes. Even though, some users
|
||||||
already have it working and the feature is even tested in the project, there is a clear lack of documentation. The
|
already have it working and the feature is even tested in the project, there is a clear lack of documentation. The
|
||||||
second item is to provide a Helm chart to streamline the setup on Kubernetes.
|
second item is to provide a Helm chart to streamline the setup on Kubernetes.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue